We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy from the information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to over the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can develop inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
The main objectives of police should be to apprehend offenders, look into crimes, and prosecute them before the cours also to prevent to commission of crime, and previously mentioned all make certain regulation and order to protect citizen???s life and property. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this can be a free and democratic place, and once a person becomes a major they can marry whosoever he/she likes; When the parents in the boy or girl will not approve of these inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they will do if they might Slash off social relations with the son or even the daughter, Nonetheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Lady that is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or man who's a major, the couple is neither harassed by everyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who offers these types of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to activity by instituting criminal proceedings by the police against this sort of persons and further stern action is taken against this sort of person(s) as provided by legislation.
Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that could possibly be consulted in deciding a current case. It could be used to guide the court, but is not binding precedent.
The Supreme Court's explanation from Fida Muhammad v. Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and others (2021 SCMR 1895), Evidently distinguished between up-gradation and promotion. Promotion entails a go to the higher position with increased responsibilities and rank. Upgradation, on the other hand, supplies financial relief by positioning an employee in a higher pay back scale, without changing their work duties or position. It's a mechanism designed to address the stagnation of employees who have remained while in the same shell out scale for a protracted time, particularly when they lack alternatives for promotion. Upgradation is actually a policy Resource used to alleviate the hardship of lengthy-term stagnation. Read more
The proposal appears to be reasonable and acceded to. From the meantime police shall remain neutral within the private dispute between the parties, however, if any of the individuals is indulged in criminal exercise the police shall consider prompt action against them under regulation. 5. The instant petition is disposed of in the above terms. Read more
Regulation professors traditionally have played a much more compact role in creating case law in common regulation than professors in civil law. Because court decisions in civil regulation traditions are historically brief[4] and not formally amenable to establishing precedent, much on the exposition from the law in civil legislation traditions is done by lecturers rather than by judges; this is called doctrine and will be published in treatises or in journals which include Recueil Dalloz in France. Historically, common legislation courts relied minor on legal scholarship; Hence, for the turn in the twentieth century, it was quite scarce to find out an instructional writer quoted inside a legal decision (besides perhaps to the academic writings of outstanding judges including Coke and Blackstone).
Amir Abdul Majid, 2021 SCMR 420. twelve. There isn't any denial from the fact that in Government service it is anticipated that the persons getting their character over board, free from any moral stigma, are to generally be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is actually a condition precedent for appointment into a Government service. The candidates must have good character and supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above is that the only impediment to being appointed into a Government service is the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a means out or guise to carry out absent with the candidature of the petitioner. Read more
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming towards the main case, It is additionally a well-set up proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is topic towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.
Are you looking for Court Information? You should use our site to search for just a case or search to get a person. Information on the site is updated every 24 several hours at three:00 am. Please Note: Name and Case information found to the search site is provided to be used as reference material and isn't the official court record.
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others check here Sindh High Court, Karachi It really is perfectly-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within 90 times. If the appeal just isn't decided within that timeframe, he/she will then strategy the service tribunal to challenge the original order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, as the 90 days to the department to act has already expired. About the aforesaid proposition, we're guided with the decision from the Supreme Court from the case of Dr.
The reason for this difference is that these civil legislation jurisdictions adhere to a tradition that the reader should manage to deduce the logic from the decision as well as the statutes.[4]
Preceding 4 tax years interpreted. It's not at all from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more
The Court holds the authority to review any criminal or civil cases, except for most civil cases in which the amount in controversy does not exceed $200. In addition it regulates the legal profession in Washington, and it has issued a Code of Judicial Conduct to guide the actions of state judges.